BREAKING: Latest SCOTUS Filing Has Potential to Impact Hundreds of J6 Cases – Lawyers Seek to Toss Controversial 1512 Obstruction Charges Against January 6 Defendant Jake Lang | The Gateway Pundit | by Shawn Bradley Witzemann

BREAKING: Latest SCOTUS Filing Has Potential to Impact Hundreds of J6 Cases – Lawyers Seek to Toss Controversial 1512 Obstruction Charges Against January 6 Defendant Jake Lang | The Gateway Pundit | by Shawn Bradley Witzemann
BREAKING: Latest SCOTUS Filing Has Potential to Impact Hundreds of J6 Cases – Lawyers Seek to Toss Controversial 1512 Obstruction Charges Against January 6 Defendant Jake Lang | The Gateway Pundit | by Shawn Bradley Witzemann

January sixth Defendant Jake Lang is taking his case to the best courtroom within the land.

Lang’s choice to maneuver his arguments to the Supreme Courtroom follows a break up ruling within the DC Courtroom of Appeals in April.

As reported by The Gateway Pundit, two of three judges on the appellate panel dominated towards U.S. District Choose Carl Nichols, who dismissed the 1512 felony obstruction cost in three separate instances towards January sixth defendants.

Maybe most notable among the many affected was Jacob Edward Langbroadly recognized by TGP readers by a number of eyewitness accounts of his repeated efforts to save lots of lives throughout the onslaught of violence close to the U.S. Capitol tunnel the place Rosanne Boyland was killed.

The break up ruling reinstated the felony obstruction cost towards Lang and two others: Garret Miller, who pleaded responsible to 11 different legal costs and was sentenced in February, and A.J. Fischer who, like Lang, continues to await trial.

Lang, who’s charged with a number of felonies, just lately filed his petition to the USA Supreme Courtroom —asking that the 1512 felony obstruction cost be dismissed.

The submitting begins with a query:

“Whether or not the Courtroom of Appeals erred in concluding that software of 18 U.S.C. Part 1512(c)(2), a statute crafted to forestall tampering with proof in “official proceedings,” can be utilized to prosecute acts of violence towards cops within the context of a public demonstration that was a riot, leading to so “breathtaking” an software of the statute as to run afoul of Van Buren v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 1648 (2021).”

As was extensively detailed in The Gateway Pundit, the 1512 Felony Obstruction cost was repurposed particularly for January sixthdefendants.

Though Lang’s submitting particularly seeks clarification in a case resembling his (the place violence was concerned), a SCOTUS ruling on the matter is more likely to have far reaching influence on a whole bunch of non-violent J6ers — A lot of  whom are presently dealing with the prospect of years in jail, together with the everlasting lack of their 2nd Modification rights.

Attorney Norm Pattis, who, together with Steven Metcalf, filed the petition on behalf of Lang, says the present software of the 1512 statute is yet one more instance of presidency misuse of regulation as a method to “crush dissenters.”

“We’re asking the courtroom to step up and rein in an out-of-control Justice Division,” says Pattis.

Contribute to Jake’s Legal Fund HERE

READ the total petition beneath:

Source link