Super PAC Debate Memo Spells Trouble for Ron DeSantis

In the latest blow to his already faltering presidential campaign, a super PAC debate memo has emerged that highlights the embarrassing reality of Governor Ron DeSantis’s candidacy. The memo, posted online by a firm associated with the super PAC, offers blunt advice, research memos, and internal polling to guide DeSantis ahead of an upcoming Republican debate. However, if DeSantis were to follow any of the advice in this memo, he would only further cement his image as a mere tool of the super PAC, rather than a capable and independent candidate. It’s a sad state of affairs when a presidential hopeful needs to be advised on how to be a human being and fed lines to navigate through a debate. With this newfound revelation, DeSantis’s chances of gaining the support of MAGA appear even more unlikely. As the memo becomes public knowledge, it’s becoming increasingly clear that this revelation may just be the final blow that sends DeSantis back to Florida in utter humiliation.

Super PAC Debate Memo Spells Trouble for Ron DeSantis


Ron DeSantis, the Republican governor of Florida, is facing a major setback in his presidential campaign due to the recently uncovered super PAC debate memo. This memo, leaked to the public, contains blunt advice, research memos, and internal polling data aimed at guiding DeSantis’s performance in the upcoming Republican presidential debate.

Contents of the Memo

The memo consists of four key recommendations for DeSantis, referred to as “GRD” in the document. First, the memo advises him to attack Joe Biden and the media multiple times during the debate. Second, it emphasizes the importance of stating GRD’s positive vision for the country. Third, the memo suggests hammering Vivek Ramaswamy in response to a question or criticism. Finally, it encourages DeSantis to defend Donald Trump in absentia, specifically in response to potential attacks from Chris Christie.

Implications for DeSantis

The exposure of this Super PAC debate memo has significant implications for DeSantis’s campaign. Firstly, it highlights his dependence on Super PACs, raising questions about his autonomy and leadership ability. Secondly, it reveals that DeSantis has lost control over his campaign, as a firm associated with the Super PAC is providing direction and guidance.

Impact on DeSantis’ Campaign

The memo’s revelations are likely to lead to diminished trust and support for DeSantis. The public perception of his campaign and credibility will be negatively affected, potentially resulting in a loss of donors and voters. These implications could prove detrimental to DeSantis’s presidential aspirations.

Lack of Independence

The memo’s contents point to a concerning lack of independence on the part of Ron DeSantis. The Super PAC’s takeover of his campaign raises doubts about his ability to make informed decisions and calls into question his credibility as a leader. This lack of autonomy may diminish the public’s confidence in his candidacy.

Advice to Attack Biden and the Media

The memo explicitly advises DeSantis to launch multiple attacks against Joe Biden and the media during the debate. While the attack strategy may be an attempt to garner support from conservative voters, it also carries the risk of negative backlash. Critics argue that focusing on attacks instead of policy proposals or a positive vision could harm DeSantis’s chances of winning over undecided voters.

Importance of GRD’s Positive Vision

Despite the memo’s emphasis on attacking opponents, it is crucial for DeSantis to convey his positive vision for the country. Great emphasis should be placed on contrasting his positive messaging with the attack strategy outlined in the memo. By articulating a positive and compelling vision, DeSantis can appeal to a broader base of voters.

Highlighting Vivek Ramaswamy

The memo singles out Vivek Ramaswamy as a target for DeSantis to take on during the debate. The reasons for highlighting Ramaswamy are unclear, but his role in the debate could potentially shape the narrative around DeSantis’s candidacy. It remains to be seen how DeSantis will address Ramaswamy’s criticisms or questions during the debate and what impact this will have on his campaign.

Defending Trump

The memo instructs DeSantis to defend Donald Trump in absentia, particularly in response to potential attacks from Chris Christie. This tactic highlights DeSantis’s alignment with Trump and demonstrates his attempt to appeal to the former president’s base. However, given the polarizing nature of Trump’s presidency, this strategy may alienate moderate and independent voters.

DeSantis’ Image and Credibility

The exposure of the Super PAC debate memo raises concerns about DeSantis’s image and credibility. The fact that he requires advice and scripted lines to navigate a debate is seen by many as a sign of weakness. This revelation may further erode public confidence in his ability to lead effectively, potentially damaging his campaign and chances of securing the Republican nomination.

Creating Viral Moments for Media Attention

The memo advises DeSantis on creating viral moments during the debate in order to generate media attention. This strategy demonstrates a desire to stand out and capture the public’s attention. However, the attempt to manufacture viral moments may come across as contrived and inauthentic, potentially diminishing their impact on DeSantis’s campaign.

In conclusion, the Super PAC debate memo leak spells trouble for Ron DeSantis’s presidential campaign. The implications of the memo’s contents range from questions about his independence and leadership ability to potential damage to his reputation and loss of support. DeSantis now faces the challenge of navigating the debate while balancing the advice outlined in the memo with the need to convey a positive vision for the country. The revelations in the memo shed light on the inner workings of DeSantis’s campaign and may significantly impact its trajectory moving forward.